A Convicted Child Rapist Is Competing At Olympics - Medals Above Principles?

The Olympics is a grand celebration of determination, perseverance, and community, honouring athletes worldwide who have dedicated their lives to excellence in sports. However, beneath this inspiring facade, some dark realities emerge, revealing a twisted side of the stories we so eagerly celebrate. A recent controversy involving Dutch beach volleyball player Steven van de Velde, set to compete in the Paris Olympics 2024, has sparked a significant ethical debate.

Van de Velde's Criminal Past

Steven van de Velde, now 29, has a deeply twisted history. In 2014, at the age of 19, he was convicted of raping a 12-year-old girl he met on Facebook. The occurred in Milton Keynes, UK, where Van de Velde travelled specifically to meet the girl. Aylesbury Crown Court sentenced him to four years in prison in 2016, although he served just one year in the Netherlands.

The Controversy Over His Participation

Despite his criminal history, the Dutch Olympic Committee has decided not to exclude Van de Velde from the Games. They stated that Van de Velde has been participating in international beach volleyball tournaments since 2018 following an "intensive professionally supervised trajectory." This decision has ignited outrage, questioning the integrity of the selection process and the message it sends to athletes and fans.

The Ethical Implications

The notion that a convicted child rapist can represent his country at the highest level of sports is profoundly unsettling. While rehabilitation and second chances are essential aspects of justice, the role of elite athletes as role models cannot be overlooked. Allowing Van de Velde to compete undermines the values that sports are meant to represent. The survivor's family, in particular, must find this decision deeply distressing.

Van de Velde's presence at the Paris Olympics is not expected to be smooth. The public and media scrutiny will be intense, and the Dutch team's decision to bar him from media interviews suggests an attempt to minimize backlash. However, the court of public opinion is likely to be unforgiving.

A Convicted Child Rapist Can Compete At Olympics  

In what can be seen as a double standard practised by the Olympic committee, while a convicted felon is proudly included in the national squad, a woman wearing a hijab of her own will is barred from the opening ceremony of the Olympics. 

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Tazin (@tazinkhannorelius)

Differences In Legal Perspectives

The differing reactions between the Netherlands and the UK highlight a significant legal distinction. In the UK, sex with a 12-year-old is unequivocally classified as rape, whereas in the Netherlands, Van de Velde's crime was considered the lesser offence of "ontucht" (indecency). This legal nuance may contribute to the muted reaction in the Netherlands.

Impact On Survivors And Society

The participation of Van de Velde in the Olympics raises critical questions about the impact on survivors of sexual abuse. For the survivor, seeing her rapist gain fame on an international stage must be incredibly traumatic. True rehabilitation would involve actively using his platform to address the impact of sexual abuse and contribute positively to society.

A Call For Ethical Accountability

Global events like the Olympics wield immense power to shape and define ethical boundaries, influencing societal norms and maintaining power balances on an international scale. These events have the potential to uplift the human spirit and promote values such as fairness, integrity, and respect. However, it is extremely disheartening to witness a country prioritize winning a medal over maintaining these principles, choosing to send criminals to the global stage.

The decision to allow Steven van de Velde to compete in the Paris Olympics is a stark reminder of the complex ethical issues within sports. The sports community must reflect on the values it upholds and the messages it sends to both athletes and fans.