Amid Protest, Columbia Uni Passes No-Confidence Against Its President

Universities across the United States are currently witnessing a surge of protests as a response to the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. What started as a demonstration at Columbia University has quickly spread across the country, as students from different universities unite in solidarity to voice their concerns. Amid rising tensions, faculty at Columbia passed a no-confidence resolution against President Nemat Shafik on May 16, saying she engaged in an “unprecedented assault on student’s rights.” The faculty pointed out that Shafik had violated the “fundamental requirements of academic freedom and shared governance."

The New York Times reported that the no-confidence resolution was introduced by the campus chapter of a professional faculty organization called the American Association of University Professors. Of the 709 professors who voted, 65% were in favour of the resolution, 29% were against it and 6% abstained. 

Protests At US Universities

The prestigious New York University has become the epicentre of this movement, with over 130 individuals arrested during protests on its campus, whereas anti-Israel protesters at Harvard University recently raised the Palestinian flag atop the iconic John Harvard statue, a symbol traditionally reserved for the American flag.

The protestors at Harvard highlighted the ongoing tensions surrounding the Israel-Palestine conflict and the increasing support for Palestinian rights within academic circles. With arrests nearing 900 since the April 18th mass detentions at Columbia University, the escalation of tensions signals a growing fervour in the movement.

Defiance Amidst Campus Protests

The raising of the Palestinian flag over the John Harvard statue, traditionally reserved for the American flag, marks a symbolic act of resistance against the backdrop of the Gaza War. Pro-Palestine demonstrators, undeterred by the university's policies, have continued their agitation, advocating for solidarity with the Palestinian cause. The scene at Harvard reflects a broader trend of activism, where students are leveraging their platforms to condemn what they perceive as injustices perpetrated against the Palestinian people.

The Causes of Unrest

The recent protests at  New York University aren't isolated incidents but part of a larger trend unfolding across American campuses. The arrest of over 100 pro-Palestinian demonstrators at Columbia University last week served as a spark for further protests, prompting solidarity actions at other prestigious institutions, including New York University, Yale, the University of Michigan, and the University of Minnesota, among others.

These demonstrations saw students setting up encampments, occupying buildings, and advocating for Palestinian rights amid rising tensions.

The current wave of protests is not without historical precedent. Columbia University, in particular, has a storied history of student activism, dating back to the 1968 protests against racism and the Vietnam War.

Arrests and Campus Confrontations

The incidents at Harvard University and New York University are not isolated events but rather part of a nationwide surge in pro-Palestine protests, characterized by confrontations between demonstrators and authorities. From Indiana University at Bloomington to Washington University in St. Louis, arrests have become commonplace as tensions escalate. The clash between pro-Israeli and pro-Palestinian factions, as witnessed at the University of California, Los Angeles, represents the polarizing nature of the discourse surrounding the conflict.

Response from Authorities

In response to the escalating protests, university administrations grappled with the challenge of balancing free speech rights with maintaining campus safety. At Columbia University, the administration opted for a hybrid learning approach for the remainder of the semester due to safety concerns. Various universities across the United States have dealt with disorderly conduct charges and protests in different ways.

For instance, New York University has made arrests and issued summonses. In contrast, Harvard University has implemented strict security measures to prevent protests, while Yale University has disbanded encampments through police intervention. The delicate balance between upholding free expression and ensuring campus safety has presented a formidable challenge for educational institutions struggling with the repercussions of geopolitical conflicts.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by BBC News (@bbcnews)

Institutions like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have become central points for activism, with students urging the severance of research ties with entities associated with the Israeli government. The resonance of Columbia University's protests has rippled across campuses, galvanizing students to mobilize for change and amplify their voices on contentious global issues.

Legal and Civil Liberties

Legal experts and civil liberties organizations have weighed in on the situation, emphasizing the importance of protecting free speech rights while preventing targeted harassment or intimidation. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) cautioned against conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism and urged universities to uphold the principles of academic freedom.

Students, meanwhile, have voiced a spectrum of perspectives on the conflict and its ramifications. While some express solidarity with Palestinians and advocate for divestment from institutions with ties to Israel, others harbour concerns about the prevalence of antisemitic rhetoric and the erosion of constructive dialogue.

A law student at New York University named Byul Yoon, reported by AFP, criticized the recent arrests, stating, “really outrageous crackdown by the university to allow the police to arrest students on our campus." Yoon further emphasized how academic freedom is crucial to facilitating meaningful dialogue. On the other hand, Leo Auerbach, a student from the University of Michigan, reported by AP that he feared "hateful rhetoric and antisemitic sentiment being echoed,” and highlighted the significance of inclusivity within campus communities.