A housing society in Hyderabad is facing a storm of criticism after issuing a notice that imposes a hefty fine of Rs 1000 on service workers, including housemaids and delivery personnel, caught using the building's main elevator. The controversy has sparked a heated debate on social media platforms, exposing the deep-seated societal issues surrounding class distinctions and discriminatory practices.
The uproar began when Shaheena, a resident of the society, took to social media to condemn the punitive measures. In a heartfelt video, she questioned the societal tendency to segregate based on occupation and drew comparisons with Western countries where workers are treated with equality and respect. Shaheena's posts shed light on the elitist attitude prevailing in some segments of Indian society and called for an end to such discriminatory behaviour.
A Society In Question
As a society we are programmed to hide our dark and dirty secrets and today we think the people who do our hard labour work cannot coexist in a same space as we are. Incase they are caught? Like it’s a crime? Fine of 1000? It’s probably 25% of most of their salary. pic.twitter.com/bmwkcs37J9
— Shaheena Attarwala شاہینہ (@RuthlessUx) November 26, 2023
"As a society, we are programmed to hide our dark and dirty secrets and today we think the people who do our hard labor work cannot coexist in the same space as we are. In case they are caught? Like it’s a crime? A fine of 1000? It’s probably 25% of most of their salary," she expressed in her video caption.
The Social Media Debate
The notice issued by the housing society triggered a flurry of responses on social media. Many argued that it reinforces existing class divisions, pointing out the irony of relying on these workers for essential services while denying them the right to use the same facilities.
A user commented, "We can eat food cooked by them, have our kids cared by them, etc but somehow we don’t want to be seen to be using the same lift or space with them."
In contrast, supporters of the society's decision defended the practicality of having separate lifts, citing the issue of congestion in main elevators. They contended that this practice is not uncommon in commercial societies, emphasizing the need for efficiency and convenience for residents.
Voices of Dissent and Support
Those against the notice pointed out the ingrained classism and racism prevalent in urban centres, describing it as a wrong step. One person stated, "Indian middle class and upper middle class staying in urban centres is one of the most classiest and racist communities."
All these Residents maybe talking of Diversity, inclusion , equity and equality in their Corporate offices …. Just saying
— Kenneth Lean (@kennethlean) November 27, 2023
Indian middle class and upper middle class staying in urban centers is one of the most classiest and racist communities.
— Ashu (@ashutoshkojha) November 27, 2023
I have seen physical demarcation in many societies.
More pronounced in high end gated communities.
Pathetic. Basically all maids and service staff should boycott this society. Such inhumane ppl
— Vishal विशाल 🇮🇳 (@vishalkmumbai) November 27, 2023
“All animals are equal, some are more equal than others” - Orwell
— Piyush Gandhi (@piyushgandhi811) November 27, 2023
Humans forget to treat other humans like humans at times https://t.co/AjTrJWq6ew
— Vibin Babuurajan 👋 (@vibinbaburajan) November 27, 2023
Disgusting would be right word for someone who put this board.
— Atul Mehra (@MehraAtul123) November 27, 2023
On the other side, supporters argued for the necessity of separate service elevators. "Every building has something called a service elevator," one person remarked, emphasizing the practicality of these lifts for the transfer of goods. Another supporter suggested that residents invest significant amounts in their properties and deserve the privilege of faster elevator service.
Every building has something called a service elevator. It’s the nature of work they do, they shouldn’t cause inconvenience to tenants and other public using the space. This is normal. Shut up and sit down.
— TweeterPeter (@Manjunaath) November 27, 2023
It’s not necessarily that it is bcoz people cannot coexist . Service lifts are for transfer of goods . If maids use it then the wait time increases .
— Punita Toraskar (@impuni) November 27, 2023
There are buildings where there diff lifts for members and servants . That’s does not mean that people do not want to travel…
Disgusting would be right word for someone who put this board.
— Atul Mehra (@MehraAtul123) November 27, 2023
Come live in a big society.
— Teerth Jain (@teerthjain_) November 27, 2023
If you allow non-residents like them to enter EVERY lift, you would at least require 5 minutes to reach your home (if it's on a high floor).
So its not "discrimination" but rather the perks of giving 5 CR to live a society.
Debunking the Justification: A Softer Approach Needed?
While the argument for separate lifts has some merit, the imposition of a hefty fine raises eyebrows. Instead of fostering understanding through communication, society opted for punitive measures. The question looms large: Is punishment the only way to instill systematic order?
Online debates raged on, with some advocating for a more humane approach of educating workers about the reasons behind the separate lifts rather than penalizing them. The stark divide in opinions highlights the deeper societal issues at play.
This controversy exposes not only the specific issues within the housing society but also the broader challenges of societal divisions based on occupation and class. As the debate rages on, it prompts reflection on the need for inclusivity, respect, and understanding in our communities.