Make Prenuptial Agreement Mandatory: Delhi Court On No-Fault Divorce

Prenuptial agreements, commonly known as prenups, are contractual shields that couples create before saying, 'I do.' These legal documents hold the power to define asset ownership when the marital relationship breaks. The debate over making prenups mandatory has gained momentum in India. A recent ruling by a Delhi court has brought this issue into sharp focus, as it granted divorce on a no-fault basis to a couple who had been embroiled in legal battles for over seven years. Judge Harish Kumar made a profound observation during this case, suggesting that the time has come to make prenuptial agreements mandatory before marriage. 

This statement raises an important question: Can making compulsory prenuptial agreements help mitigate the emotional and legal turmoil that often accompanies divorce proceedings?

The case in question involved a couple who tied the knot in 2011 and, over time, had a child together. Their marriage took a turbulent turn, leading to a protracted legal battle. Both parties refused to consent to divorce; instead, they accused each other of committing atrocities, which is quite a common scenario in divorce cases.

The Call for Mandatory Prenuptial Agreements

Judge Harish Kumar's statement has profound implications: "The time has come to make compulsory a prenuptial agreement to be executed before the appointed authority after counseling of parties about the possible risk of marriage going haywire for a variety of reasons."

This assertion highlights the need for a proactive approach to addressing the complexities of modern marriages. Judge Kumar’s decision aligns with the spirit of the Family Court Act, which seeks to facilitate settlements between parties and put an end to their disputes, particularly within a family setting, without escalating the conflict by avoiding protracted litigation.

Averting Law-Induced Mental Cruelty

In the context of the aforementioned divorce case, it's evident that both spouses desired the divorce, as they both made allegations against each other in their pursuit of marital dissolution. The court, therefore, opted for a no-fault divorce, bypassing the need to assign blame or guilt. This approach not only expedites the legal process but also prevents the unnecessary mental anguish and distress that often accompanies lengthy legal battles.

Judge Harish Kumar's call for mandatory prenuptial agreements stems from a genuine concern for the mental well-being of individuals who find themselves in tumultuous marriages. The emotionally and financially draining process of divorce can be significantly alleviated by prenuptial agreements. They serve as a preventative measure, enabling couples to define their expectations, rights, and responsibilities before the onset of marital discord.

The Origins of Prenuptial Agreements

The concept of prenuptial agreements is of Western origin and has a rich historical backdrop. In some reports, it is suggested that the oldest prenup dates back over 2,000 years to ancient Egypt, where they established the property each spouse brought into the marriage. However, prenups addressing divorce rather than death did not gain significant popularity in the United States until after World War II. Even in the 1970s, courts were hesitant to enforce them, as they were seen as potentially promoting divorce.

A pivotal moment in the acceptance of prenups was the 1970 Florida case of Posner v. Posner, which set a precedent for their enforceability. Subsequently, prenuptial agreements have become increasingly common worldwide. In a 2022 poll in the United States, nearly 40% of individuals between the ages of 18 and 34 had signed prenups, illustrating their growing acceptance in modern society.

Several countries, including the United States, Canada, Australia, and France, legally recognize and enforce prenuptial agreements. England, traditionally reluctant to enforce prenuptial agreements, has seen a shift in its approach, with courts increasingly considering them when making financial adjustments for divorcing couples. In contrast, in China, prenups are considered taboo and contrary to traditional values, as they indicate a lack of trust between partners.

Legal Landscape of Prenuptial Agreements in India

Prenuptial agreements lack legal binding in India, distinguishing it from many Western countries due to Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This section deems agreements opposing public policy as void, including those concerning marriage, reinforcing their invalidity by the Indian Supreme Court. In 2015, Maneka Gandhi, the Minister for Women and Child Development, advocated for the recognition of prenuptial agreements in Indian courts, although no legal recognition has materialized, signalling a growing awareness of the issue.

Notable exceptions include Goa, governed by the Portuguese Civil Code (PCC), 1867, which recognizes prenuptial agreements. Additionally, under the Special Marriage Act of 1954, a carefully documented prenuptial agreement may gain legal standing, exemplifying the nuanced legal landscape in India.

The non-recognition of prenuptial agreements in India is rooted in cultural and social norms, where marriage is viewed as a sacred, holy ceremony and discussing divorce is considered inappropriate. Divorce remains rare in India, reflecting a strong societal commitment to preserving the sanctity of marriage.

Despite the current legal stance, there are indications of shifting attitudes. In October, a family court judge in Mumbai noted that while prenuptial agreements lack legal enforceability, they can offer insight into the intentions of the parties involved. 

The Delhi court's call for mandatory prenuptial agreements can be considered a landmark moment in Indian family law. This transformative decision holds the potential to usher in a new era of marital jurisprudence in India, marked by greater compassion and efficiency in handling the complexities of divorce.

Personal views expressed by the author are their own.

Suggested reading: Wife Insisting Husband To Abandon Parents Is Cruelty, Says Delhi HC